_People and lifestyles
Interchangeable Architecture
Architecture may be exposed as a mere object of historical significance, depicted by patterns of life, their usages and fluid change. Politics and the Situationalist International delivers a repertoire of concerns that architecture stems from only visual art but in fact dictate our past, present and future. It is obvious with these concerns that architecture is primarily seen as a vessel for social usages, rather than its understanding of people. It can be interesting too that the way we use spaces, move, transform and can become practically inert, suggest patterns of life; even a multi-dimensional perspective.
The next reading Architectural Weaponry BLDGBLOG was highly significant because it challenged traditional vernaculars within architecture to develop a concept of agitation.
'Architects are builders who theorize – articulate builders'
To suggest a mode of philosophical thinking, rather than producing an architectural reality; this is what can be imperative within architectural future scenarios. Producing an idea, a concept of architectural veracity. And to depict human interactions, human-to-human interactions, human-to-built form interactions.
The following link highlights the significance of change and influential behaviours:
Connectivity and Behaviour Changes -http://abaldaia.wordpress.com/2010/03/31/connectivity-and-behavior-changes-2/
Hylozoic Ground - Philip Beesley
